Vote No!
Why did I make this game? My brother is an ass. I feel betrayed by him. He has always been an ass but recently he crossed a bridge too far*. He has a special way of sucking the hope from me. I can't get through to him. I have tried and tried it can't be done. As a member of Itche's Adult games community this is how I express myself and look for connections. No I don't think the Adult gamers community will vindicate me. For better or worse if you are playing this you are part of this community with me. I want you to know how I feel. This is probably not the best way to go about things, but it is the best I can do.
*He told me Renee Good was a terrorist. (She was not.)
Propaganda: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a particular cause, doctrine, or point of view.
Vindicate: Show or prove to be right, reasonable, or justified.
This game is educational in that it may teach you about propaganda by using propaganda. I would not advise you trust me blindly. This is not an essay. I do not sight my sources. This is more "Get a load of this guy" not "Let me tell you a story". This is just a quick little project I made because my brother is an ass, not a political science class. I know you are just here for the boobs, but I feel I have a moral obligation to let you know this is propaganda, and I don't think it matters. If I can make Newsom, Vance and Carlson sound bad by stating facts about them they might be the problem.
If you want to learn more about these people I suggest watching Rachel Maddow. If you want to play a game that is actually educational try out Teach Me Mama. If you want to play a game about lesbians making out in the snow try Cuddle Weather.
Comments
Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.
Since all those unwanted kids with inferiority complex won't read, I'll just make sure the persons with at least a itty bitty little common sense agree with me:
1. Renee Good was NOT a terrorist, she was a decent woman who attempted to flee (yes) but without the intention of warming anyone around (there are freaking videos that proves it).
2. ICE are very close to retarded, and they might as well become the Gestapo of the USA (yes, I said GESTAPO).
3. Donald J. Trump is not and will never ever be the symbol of freedom, peace, or whatever all those suckers think he is.
4. Humanity as a whole should be ashamed that such a mistake is made yet again, LESS THAN ONE CENTURY after WWII (because the USA are not the only country where the most hideous actions can be made).
That's all, you don't need to be an expert on the subject to talk, just be human, for God's sake.
(Nice game btw, you could improve your art though, no offense)
Decent is a stretch
"Decent is a stretch" okay, even if she was a huge cunt, did she kill anyone ? No ? Then you're wrong, faggot.
You don't need to kill anyone to be a not decent person. I hate cops, but I'm not gonna do things that historically get you killed by a cop, and leave my kids without a mother. At best she was a bad mother as well as an idiot.
Yeah well I can agree with what you said. But with what you just said, we can all be considered "not decent" since we are humans. And also, she was not the one killing herself, that ICE dude did. Don't put it the other way around.
Provoking a lunatic with a gun is basically killing yourself
Yeah, all those people chasing cars, asking for papers, making people prove who they are and that they're not with a certain group. People who actively obstruct Federal officers who are enforcing laws that were enacted almost 200 years ago. People who use their vehicle as a deadly weapon against officers (if I accidently shoot someone it's still assault with a deadly weapon). Who's the real GASTAPO?
How do you know she didn't have the intention to hurt the officer?
she was looking right at him as she hit the gas. The officer can't see where the tires are pointing. He doesn't fire until he's hit.
Whole thing could've been avoided if she had not been there.
How about Jocelyn Nungaray, Laken Riley, Ivory Smith, or Jennifer Ann Morton?
Just a verry small list of the people killed and sexually assaulted by Illegal immigrants.
None of you give a shit, and it pisses me off to no end. you sit there and defend the worst in society thinking you're on the right side. Blocking ICE because they're sending people back to their home country. They don't know if the person they helped escape is a drug dealer, murderer, rapist, sex trafficker.
It's just so fucking stupid of you to think that you're four points are anything close to common sense, because you obviously have none.
Oh excuse me Captain Justice, for defending a person and not the millions of other ones.
She was looking at the man blocking her vehicle as she hit the gas? Ok, doesn't change the fact that she was clearly turning to the right of the officer, and yes, a car cannot turn on itself without going forward, too bad, she should've bought a car that had this feature.
I cannot tell that she didn't have the intention to kill the officer, of course, I cannot read minds, but let's be serious, trying to kill an ARMED guy? When there are like a dozen around the same vehicle? You create scenarios that are very stretched. If she had killed that guy, the other men would've just shot her dead instantly, and (even though I cannot tell her IQ from a video) I think that she knew that.
Of course the whole thing could've been avoided if she wasn't there, I agree, but it's like saying "fire burns", it has no use to point that out.
You just gave victims of immigrants, okay, but uh, where's the link to the current case, pretty please? Yes those persons died, yes they died because of immigrants. So what? Gotta kill em all? Just like the jews? They will steal our jobs and rape all our children? We have to put a cloth on their shirt so we can reckognize an immigrant when we see one?
I know it might seem dumb to you, what I am saying. But what I try to tell is, we cannot tell which human will do right or wrong. And of course the police is useful to society, of course we need armed people to protect the "good" citizen. Without the police, I'd be dead years ago, so I'm grateful.
Also, bold of you to say that I am defending the worst in society. I just try to view the situation under all the angles, and I won't defend an immigrant just because it's an immigrant. I just think that ICE abuses power over those who has few to none, which has to be mentioned.
You say that my four points are no close to common sense, I might have been hot headed when I wrote it, I agree. However, I do not think that you are close to common sense either.
After all, we are only humans, how can we have common sense, when we are all biased by our experiences, family, friends, TV, etc... I hope you can at least agree with that. Otherwise, we are just two people defending one same thing differently, justice.
She was attempting to drive away from a federal officer telling her to exit the vehicle, knowing that another officer was in front of the vehicle. She may not have intended to hit or hurt him, but she bares the responsibility of her actions. Did she deserve to die? No, absolutely not. it's a sad situation that could've been avoided many different ways.
My "created scenarios"? She's obstructing federal officers, she tries to flee, she hits an officer with her car. That's the scenario with a tragic but predictable end.
I never said, "intention to kill". I said harmed, big difference. I don't think she did have that intention, but I also think her and her wife were treating this as some kind of game, and it's not.
And yeah, if she wasn't there it wouldn't happen. Hindsight is 20/20, and that makes judging the officers' actions harder. You can't pause, slow down time, or rewind and watch it 20 times to really analyze in the moment. 1 maybe 2 seconds to decide.
The victims I gave were killed by ILLEGAL immigrants, people who are here illegally thanks to policies enacted to subvert immigration laws. If those laws were being enforced they, and many others, would still be alive.
But your "so what" tells me you don't give a shit. exactly like I said. Why? Because you're so delusional, and brain washed to think that ICE is a Gestapo. for sending people back to their home country? I must have missed any shred of evidence of the "Gotta kill em all" attitude. And it's not a rebuttal to an opposing view without alluding to them being a Nazi.
The link to the current case is what I said in my original comment. They don't know who ICE is going after. They could escape, and later on kill or rape someone. They could be a drug dealer, cartel member, sex trafficker. They could be just someone trying to live their life, but they still entered the country illegally.
I'm glad the police could be there when you needed them, genuinely. They aren't just there for the good citizens. They're here for every person, good or bad. everyone has rights in this country, even Illegal immigrants.
I think ICE is handling their deportation efforts badly, but I don't think they're on some power trip. ICE agents are constantly being attacked, blocked by protesters, surrounded by people yelling at them, abandoned by local police, and shot at. ICE agents were just shot at in my state. I don't think it's fair to call it an abuse of power without mentioning the constant abuse and danger these protesters are putting these agents in. It adds context to the increased aggression from Ice. I understand it, but don't agree with it
I'll agree we're all biased. I'm biased because I'm supported by facts, I critical think, have common sense, and the truth is on my side.
And if your idea of "justice" is saying "so what" to children and women being raped and killed by ILLEGAL immigrants, then it's not a justice system I can get behind.
I saw your comment a while a go and I didn't know how to respond. I think I do now. I am watching Brennen ask Hank anything. They are talking about chemo and something clicked in my head. Hank said he wanted his doctor to tell him what to eat to stop the cancer, because having a daily ritual of eating something would give him control in a scary time. I think the people who blame Renee Good have to belive she had contol of the situation, because they have to belive they would have control in that situation. Does that sound right to you? Do you think Renee Good had any control in that situation? Do you think you would have had any control in that situation?
I can feel the desire to say "It is irrelevant. I would never be in that situation." But that would be refusing to engage with the exercise and it would also be assuming she put herself in that situation willingly. She was pulling away from the curb and stopped to let another car pass. She did heckle Johnathan Ross, but she was not one of the protesters. They thought she was one of the protesrers and tried to stop her from leaving for reasons I do not know. (Sitation: LegalEagle).
PS: You said "They don't know if the person they helped escape is a drug dealer, murderer, rapist, sex trafficker." There was no person she helped escape. They stopped her because they were surrouned by protestors and they thought she was one of them. She was not.
it wasn't terrorism but driving into a cop is a great way to get yourself shot. despicable doing things like that while being a mother, and bringing her dog who could have been hurt was dumb.
shut yo ass up that's not cause for lethal force dumbass
It one hundred percent is lol what planet do you live on where hitting someone with your car on purpose isn't attempted murder
1. Please show me where law enforcement are instructed to use their own body to block a vehicle.
2. Turning the vehicle the exact opposite way of a person someone is attempting to murder seems to go exactly against that rationality.
What am I missing here? You sure seem convinced otherwise so you must have better reasoning.
You're missing the part where she intentionally hit someone with her car it seems
Oh I see. In that case, again, I'd love to know where officers are instructed to block vehicles with their own body. Please enlighten me.
Literally the Minneapolis police
Art's a great way to express your feelings. I appreciate this.
My only complaint really is that it can sometimes get difficult to know who we're answering questions about. If you plan to release updates, my suggestion would just be to make that more clear.
sorry you got into a fight with your bro. Glad your making a vent game? Hope things improve.
How did we go from clicking on cute deers and doing math to creating political propaganda (,,•᷄ࡇ•᷅ ,,)?
Follow up.
You and your brother would both benefit from putting your political differences aside and assessing the known facts of the situation.
I found your reaction interesting. Teach Me Mama is a political game. It teaches the taxanomical ranks. Any creatonist will tell you animals are grouped by "kinds" not taxanomical ranks. I have always been political. You just never noticed because up until now my games have aligned with your political views. You could argue this is not the same thing and I would agree, but not everyone would.
Thank you for your concern. My brother and I have been having fights like this for years. We will be fine.
Wut 😵💫?
I might be too gooner brained to understand most of this, but I think you're conflating the fact that politics has concerned itself with the governance of everything with, well, everything just existing as it is.
Just because you've made a game about grouping animals, something that's done across many fields of study, how does that make it political?
Whilst this game, is clearly political, since it's all about actual politicians and rewarding the player for agreeing with your opinions about them.
Edit:
You don't have to look any further than the comment sections between these two games to see that one is a political game, and the other is just your regular game, regardless of how much you think you made it political.
To clarify, I don't think Teach Me Mama is political in the same way as this game. I was pointing out the fact many people would. When I said ask any creationist I was being hyperbolic. I know not every creationost denouces the taxanomical ranks. You asked a question and I was genuenly trying to answer it. Maybe I didn't do the best job. My point was this game is not taking as far a leap as it might first appear. It is a matter of persepective.
yeah... I play adult games to get away from political nonesense and escape the 'real' world. Let me date my pony imoutos and forget that reality sucks LOL
(I have not always been the best at not ranting on it myself, but I've been getting better at not doing so outside my blog)
Adult games are the one last place where its super tough to find political stuff.
I agree with you. I play adult games for the same reason (especally the pony imoutos). Adult games are in of themselves political. I know you know this better than most. I agree there is a time and place for politics and I am sure you will agree that does include in adult games. I don't necessarily want to see more political adult games, but if they are sincere and come from a good place I would not mind seeing more of them. I don't think the problem is my game is political. The problem is my game is heavy handed. If the game was more refined subtle I am sure you would like it more. This is vent art. Thanks for your concern. My brother and I are doing fine.
... I uh... I don't actually agree. The whole 'everything is political' is a statement of wokeness and marxism and is entirely fabricated to suit only a specific set of philosophical beliefs. (there are other philosphies out there you can choose to believe in, Dudism for example)
I actually abhor any real life politics in my games, especially my erotic games. Even if your game was more subtle, so long as it still reflected real life situations in such a way that it was obvious what they were, it would be an issue.
The most politics I want, is the purple haired lady trying to figure out why her mom and sister tried to kill her and what ork is the best one to breed with in order to further her investigation (kingdoms of deception)
I only gave Brendt Ultrabrick or whatever Fuchur's game was a pass, because it was like, the most unhinged south park level comedy I had ever seen. They had a knack for telling a story first, full of comical satire that you were not supposed to take seriously; the sexy parts were like... fourth down on the list. They are so far, the only ones to get a pass (also like, their politics are from a 15 year old event, no longer relevent)
most things are not political except you force to be political, and forcing politics onto something is just silly. We need escapism, not more drama
Do i think that erotic games have meaning, themes, and stories. lessons and morals to learn from or to be explored both in light and dark settings, hell yeah. but that doesn't mean that something like Hold Me Tight All Night Onee chan, has ANY politics at all.
or to sum up
Just because you can Force anything to be political, does not mean everything Is poltical. Most of the time, boobs are just boobs without any need for a deeper explanation.
I can't disagree with what you said and I am not going to try. I respect your opinons and broadly agree with you. Not compleatly, but in the words of Anthony Bordane "Surrounding myself with people who always agree with me is the most boring prospect I have ever heard."
I know we talked about this before, but I don't know what wokenss or marxism are. I had a friend who was really into philosophy and he would tell me about it, and my eyes would glaze over. My knowledge of philosopy begins and ends with Plato. I acknowledge and appreciate you know a lot more about this than I do.
I am glad you acknowledge there are exceptions. People who isnist things have to be a specific way are usally either surgeons or jackasses (as far as I can tell you are not either).
When I said adult games are in of themselves political I was refering to the fact Porn Hub is banned in 22 states. I don't think adult games should be political, but they are. It is like rock music in the eighties (I think. I was not alive back then). Dee Snider had to testify infront of congress because they decided his music was political.
I understand what you are saying and I hope you understand what I am saying even if you don't agree with me.